Learn Valyrian > Valyrian Language Updates

The High Valyrian Dictionary Thread

<< < (2/4) > >>

Najahho:
I have finished the first edition of the High Valyrian lexicon at the Valyrian wiki! Enjoy: http://wiki.dothraki.org/dothraki/Valyrian/High_Valyrian_Vocabulary

The vocabulary will keep growing and verbs and adjectives will be added soon.

ingsve:

--- Quote from: Najahho on June 19, 2013, 11:14:27 pm ---I have finished the first edition of the High Valyrian lexicon at the Valyrian wiki! Enjoy: http://wiki.dothraki.org/dothraki/Valyrian/High_Valyrian_Vocabulary

The vocabulary will keep growing and verbs and adjectives will be added soon.

--- End quote ---

That formatting looks really cluttered. First of all I think the noun classes should just be marked with a single letter so "nl." "ns." "na." and "nt.".

Is there really a need to list person and number in the vocabulary? Usually all nouns should just be listed in the nominative in a dictionary.

Najahho:

--- Quote from: ingsve on June 20, 2013, 01:52:15 am ---
--- Quote from: Najahho on June 19, 2013, 11:14:27 pm ---I have finished the first edition of the High Valyrian lexicon at the Valyrian wiki! Enjoy: http://wiki.dothraki.org/dothraki/Valyrian/High_Valyrian_Vocabulary

The vocabulary will keep growing and verbs and adjectives will be added soon.

--- End quote ---

That formatting looks really cluttered. First of all I think the noun classes should just be marked with a single letter so "nl." "ns." "na." and "nt.".

Is there really a need to list person and number in the vocabulary? Usually all nouns should just be listed in the nominative in a dictionary.

--- End quote ---

What person? What do you mean? There are no verbs yet. They are all listed in the nominative which is not stated and they are in "sg." because there are also collectives relexicalized.

The formatting is exactly the same as the one used for the Dothraki vocabulary list.

Edit: Ok, now I got you. It's not marked for "person", what you see there is the gender and the declension type, so lunar 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc, then solar 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc and so on. The singular could be suppressed but we were thinking that it might be useful to contrast with collectives. Also I don't think a one letter abbreviation is a good idea, since the genders are very peculiar, not that common and people could get confused by "na." and such. Maybe the best way to abbreviate them would be aq., sol., lun. and ter. Whatever people think is more helpful. What do you think?

zorah:
You don't even know how happy I am now! Thank you for this! :)

Najahho:

--- Quote from: zorah on June 20, 2013, 12:59:59 pm ---You don't even know how happy I am now! Thank you for this! :)

--- End quote ---

Thanks so much for that, hehe. Happy you found it useful :)

Stay tuned for updates!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version